Posted by: Zazzy | September 1, 2007

type 2 and testing

There’s been talk among us off and on about monitoring. Very Old, Very Healthy Diabetic posed the same question last June. Why don’t type 2’s monitor blood sugar more?

At the time, I ranted, “The number one reason, in my most humble opinion, that type 2s don’t test more is we are told by our doctors we only need to test daily. Or every other day, even. I’m told that there’s not much of a risk of going low (unless I’m exercising tight control) by my doctors so I don’t need to test. I don’t need to know how I react to different foods. I don’t need to know how my blood sugar trends. [...] If the doctors don’t take it seriously how hard is it for us to take it seriously?”

A study in the British Medical Journal not surprisingly found that people with type 2 “tended not to be influenced by their readings’ results – probably because they had not been told what to do.”

Therefore, Dr. Elizabeth Peel and team spoke to 18 newly diagnosed diabetes type 2 patients over a period of four years. The aim was to find out what they thought about self-monitoring over that period.

Unsurprisingly, they found that as time went by the self monitoring was either discontinued or happened less regularly. Some of the participants were not too sure how to interpret the test results and what to do about them, while others said they found it reassuring. A consistent problem was what to do about high readings.

The majority of the participants wondered whether health professionals placed a high value on their readings, saying that doctors seemed little interested in their self-monitored test results after the initial phase. Some patients regarded this as a sign that self-monitoring was either pointless or unimportant. A number of them continued self-monitoring because they themselves wanted to, even though doctors seemed to give the impression that it did not matter.

ARTICLE


Responses

  1. They’ve been spying on me again. This sounds so familiar – like maybe it’s happened to me. I only remember to check my sugars once or sometimes twice a week. If I have a high there’s nothing I can do to bring it down except watch what I eat for a meal or two. I suppose vigorous exercise might make a difference, but I’ve never wanted to test that theory. ;) After Ed was put on insulin four times a day we checked his sugars in order to figure dosages. Other than that the doctor has an A1c test done every 3 months. What else can we who do not “shoot up” do?

  2. Whenever I have consulted the RDE about my diet, I have kept a detailed log of BG readings and what I ate before I saw her. She never seemed to detect a pattern from these but was interested to see them. If she had seen a pattern of highs/lows I’m sure she would have had some suggestions for correcting the problem. Otherwise I really can’t see any great need to check frequently. It’s not like I could take an extra pill to cover the highs, and I’ve been told that lows are not a result of the meds I take so no need to do anything other than have a sandwich there, either. And usually with a low I get very hungry so …

  3. Frequent testing is good since at least I can read patterns from those somewhat if I know what foods were ingested, I try to help mom with it some, she still gets surprised by me telling her what foods will do what to her BG and being right more often than not, still don’t have diabetes myself, but I am definitely in the risk zone and am trying to avoid getting it if I can… Not that I am sure one can actually prevent it for real since I know some who have gotten type 2 that live what seems to be very healthy lives, so it is not all related to diet and such, but I am sure it matters.

  4. “If I have a high there’s nothing I can do to bring it down except watch what I eat for a meal or two.”

    Exactly. Which leads, in me, to just not wanting to know. Why test if I know it’s going to depress me? But that leads to the land of denial and my current high numbers.

    I agree with the wraith that testing helps us know how different things are affecting us. The hard part is doing something about it.

  5. Zazzy,I have two local friends who have Type 2 diabetes.They are not taking any meds yet.Both test their blood sugar levels 2,sometimes 3 times a day though.Their doctors encouraged them to buy the monitors.Both know how to interpret the readings.One was a nurse,the other one had a DM and DSIS with Type 1,her DGD also has Type 1 diabetes.Both say the monitor helps them to stay on track with their diet.If readings are high they always seem to know why.

  6. I’m glad for your friends and there is definitely two sides to this coin. I used to be much better at testing – I think one of the things that happens is you get tired of it. I know what the numbers mean, I know why the readings are high (most of the time), but I suck at maintaining a consistent diet right now and it feels like I don’t have control over the numbers.

    Denial is a wonderful thing.

  7. The problem is when one reads too much into the numbers and feel guilty for being high, it should not really be interpented that way, sometimes they go high for no reason at all even in normal people, me having eaten nothing have gone from 3 somewhere to 7 and then back down to around 4, I don’t know what causes that, but I think some fluctuations are normal, I still think being aware however is a lot better than being unaware.

  8. Well, when you don’t eat (especially if you’re “normal” ;) ) Glucagon causes your liver to release glucose into your blood stream.

    Related also to Dawn Phenomenon

  9. “Well,when you don’t eat (especially if you’re “normal” ) Glucagon causes your liver to release glucose into your blood stream.”
    Yes,to maintain the normal blood sugar levels between 80 – 120 ml ( 4.0 to 6.0. in Canada )

    Often,mine drop down to 40 ml,my liver doesn’t seem to release glucose when it should.I was diagnosed with hypoglycemia decades ago,after a six hour long blood sugar test in a hospital.(I had passed out the day before,the neurologist ordered the easiest tests first.).At the time I was told it would turn into diabetes as I get older.

    Another interesting thing I noticed a very long time ago.When I went on a diet I had to test for ketones,if I didn’t eat at least 800 calories a day,
    my body started to burn fat.

  10. Hypoglycemia (outside of diabetic hypoglycemia) is equally as much difficulty in maintaining your blood sugars. Most of the people I’ve known with hypo followed essentially the same diet as someone with diabetes, avoiding fast carbs to avoid the spike and crash. How do you manage your’s?

  11. Zazzy,at the time I was diagnosed they told me to
    eat a high protein diet,5 meat/egg dishes a day.I tried it but didn’t like it much,changed it to a sugar reduced/diabetes diet.Three regular main meals,lots of veggies,three snacks in between.
    Since I gained (what feels like a ton of weight) I cut out two of the snacks during the day.I always carry German dextrose cubes
    http://www.germandeli.com/traubenzucker.html
    in my purse in case my blood sugar levels drop suddenly while I’m out and about.

  12. Many of the diabetics in my extended family started with hypoglycemia and became diabetic as they got older. I think sometimes these are the most brittle as diabetics.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories